@simwhi The ads libs determine where the user is. @hgy29 I think if they don't provide a switch AND haven't said if they are GDPR ready. For example Chartboost has said they are ready and don't provide a switch - that means it must be within their library or they anonymise the data already.
Like I said though - if a game provides a switch and the user says ok to consent then the game also must have a way of forgetting all the information and also of providing what has been collected. Which opens up a can of worms!
Coder, video game industry veteran (since the '80s, ❤'s assembler), arrested - never convicted hacker (in the '90s), dad of five, he/him (if that even matters!). https://deluxepixel.com
Like I said though - if a game provides a switch and the user says ok to consent then the game also must have a way of forgetting all the information and also of providing what has been collected. Which opens up a can of worms!
@SinisterSoft Yes, indeed it does. We do not want to fall into this situation. We want to be GDPR compliant by not having, storing or using personal information at all.
Analytics would be useful but we can live without it if need be.
In reality could you imagine getting a 20Million fine? How the shat in crikey would you even begin to pay that off LOL The whole thing is a farce. I smell DOOM.
Coder, video game industry veteran (since the '80s, ❤'s assembler), arrested - never convicted hacker (in the '90s), dad of five, he/him (if that even matters!). https://deluxepixel.com
I've done what I can to the best of my ability over the last few weeks. I really don't think this has been 100% thought through by many mobile providers. Everybody wants to pass the buck on to the small guy. Totally ridiculous situation.
Personally I'll just plod along as I always have because IMHO it's a big 'storm in a teacup'.
If the fine is 20 million Euros and there are millions of apps in the google play store that break their new law then the EU is going to be so rich! However.. how the heck will they be able to afford to take millions of people to court to prosecute them? How many decades would it be before they even got to prosecuting me? Long after I'm dead and turned to dust I think.
Let us not forget also that there is the apple app store, steam, itch.io, and thousands of other sites on the net that sell games and apps that can collect such information on their users. There are so many that no organization ever would be able to prosecute them all.. period!
I think that if they were going to make a scapegoat of someone... they would target a large company that hadn't crossed their t's and dotted their i's. They are hardly going to peruse every indie dev in the world.
Yes not all providers are going in as default false...
---
By default, ad requests to Chartboost serve personalized ads, with ad selection based on the user’s previously collected data.
Now with SDK v7.2.0, ad requests to Chartboost with restrictDataCollection=YES will remove the IP address and device information from processing. With restrictDataCollection enabled, the user will not receive an ad.
Ad requests with restrictDataCollection=NO will process that user’s IP address and device information. Chartboost will serve an ad using contextual and behavioral targeting unless otherwise specified.
I therefore think the flags should be exposed via Gideros so they can be set in Lua perhaps. I imagine that to be a task given the amount of different providers tho :P
I have removed all my Admob blocks. I have no time now to update all my apps.
I will plan to update apps from one to one, may be some will be paid another free. No reason to use Ads if they pass the responsability of GDPR to developer.
'With restrictDataCollection enabled, the user will not receive an ad' ...WTF!
The other news to learn there is not only will charboost not show you a targeted ad if flag set true, they wont show you and ad at all LOL ...and we all know that that means WTF in a free game. People will just switch your ads off 100% given that choice! :P
Yes not all providers are going in as default false...
---
By default, ad requests to Chartboost serve personalized ads, with ad selection based on the user’s previously collected data.
Now with SDK v7.2.0, ad requests to Chartboost with restrictDataCollection=YES will remove the IP address and device information from processing. With restrictDataCollection enabled, the user will not receive an ad.
Ad requests with restrictDataCollection=NO will process that user’s IP address and device information. Chartboost will serve an ad using contextual and behavioral targeting unless otherwise specified.
I have received the same message, so I will remove all my apps from Chartboost. Anyway I do not get money, I think I will remove my Chartboost account for ever.
'With restrictDataCollection enabled, the user will not receive an ad' ...WTF!
The other news to learn there is not only will charboost not show you a targeted ad if flag set true, they wont show you and ad at all LOL ...and we all know that that means WTF in a free game. People will just switch your ads off 100% given that choice! :P
Right, so there is no reason to use Chartboost from now. I will delete my account.
Paid app will go back now if Ad business model is not an option. I will change all my apps to paid (may be some fully free) because of this.
There is no way to fully comply with GDPR with the current ads libs, even if they say they are compliant. If the person says it's ok to use their personal information then the ads providers also need to provide functions to 'forget' the user and also a way to deliver all they data they have on them in a machine readable form.
Coder, video game industry veteran (since the '80s, ❤'s assembler), arrested - never convicted hacker (in the '90s), dad of five, he/him (if that even matters!). https://deluxepixel.com
It may also be illegal for an app to not allow you to play/use it if you refuse to allow the company to take the data. Facebook and Google are both being taken to court (announced yesterday) because if the user doesn't allow them to take personal data then they provide a more limited service or don't allow access at all. That is for a service that needs personal data to actually operate - and is actually free!!!
In other words, there are some people who want to use facebook in the same way as everyone else but do not want facebook to have any data that can be used to identify them and they don't want facebook to communicate with them!
btw, the lawyer suing them is one of the lawyers who made up the regulations.
Coder, video game industry veteran (since the '80s, ❤'s assembler), arrested - never convicted hacker (in the '90s), dad of five, he/him (if that even matters!). https://deluxepixel.com
For me solution will be to remove all ads from apps. Ads business model could be in problem with this law.
Ads companies put responsability on publisher but it is not worth if you do not make money. Better removing ads and publishing as paid app. No more free apps.
It may also be illegal for an app to not allow you to play/use it if you refuse to allow the company to take the data. Facebook and Google are both being taken to court (announced yesterday) because if the user doesn't allow them to take personal data then they provide a more limited service or don't allow access at all. That is for a service that needs personal data to actually operate - and is actually free!!!
In other words, there are some people who want to use facebook in the same way as everyone else but do not want facebook to have any data that can be used to identify them and they don't want facebook to communicate with them!
btw, the lawyer suing them is one of the lawyers who made up the regulations.
Today I checked the game "Love Balls". Before the game begins there is a small notice from the developers asking for the user's consent to use data and serve ads. Can this be done in Gideros? Thanks
The problem is that if you actually ask for consent then you also then have to provide functions for 'the right to be forgotten' and the 'right for a copy of your data in machine readable format' - both of which are currently impossible with the advertising api that are provided by the advertisers.
Coder, video game industry veteran (since the '80s, ❤'s assembler), arrested - never convicted hacker (in the '90s), dad of five, he/him (if that even matters!). https://deluxepixel.com
Comments
@hgy29 I think if they don't provide a switch AND haven't said if they are GDPR ready. For example Chartboost has said they are ready and don't provide a switch - that means it must be within their library or they anonymise the data already.
Like I said though - if a game provides a switch and the user says ok to consent then the game also must have a way of forgetting all the information and also of providing what has been collected. Which opens up a can of worms!
Likes: MobAmuse
https://deluxepixel.com
@SinisterSoft Yes, indeed it does. We do not want to fall into this situation. We want to be GDPR compliant by not having, storing or using personal information at all.
Analytics would be useful but we can live without it if need be.
Likes: SinisterSoft, simwhi, jdbc
Likes: MobAmuse
https://deluxepixel.com
Likes: simwhi
If the fine is 20 million Euros and there are millions of apps in the google play store that break their new law then the EU is going to be so rich! However.. how the heck will they be able to afford to take millions of people to court to prosecute them? How many decades would it be before they even got to prosecuting me? Long after I'm dead and turned to dust I think.
Let us not forget also that there is the apple app store, steam, itch.io, and thousands of other sites on the net that sell games and apps that can collect such information on their users. There are so many that no organization ever would be able to prosecute them all.. period!
I think that if they were going to make a scapegoat of someone... they would target a large company that hadn't crossed their t's and dotted their i's. They are hardly going to peruse every indie dev in the world.
Likes: MobAmuse, SinisterSoft, jdbc
May the force be with you all!
Likes: antix, SinisterSoft
---
By default, ad requests to Chartboost serve personalized ads, with ad selection based on the user’s previously collected data.
Now with SDK v7.2.0, ad requests to Chartboost with restrictDataCollection=YES will remove the IP address and device information from processing. With restrictDataCollection enabled, the user will not receive an ad.
Ad requests with restrictDataCollection=NO will process that user’s IP address and device information. Chartboost will serve an ad using contextual and behavioral targeting unless otherwise specified.
Likes: jdbc
I will plan to update apps from one to one, may be some will be paid another free. No reason to use Ads if they pass the responsability of GDPR to developer.
The other news to learn there is not only will charboost not show you a targeted ad if flag set true, they wont show you and ad at all LOL ...and we all know that that means WTF in a free game. People will just switch your ads off 100% given that choice! :P
Likes: jdbc
https://answers.chartboost.com/en-us/zingtree
Paid app will go back now if Ad business model is not an option. I will change all my apps to paid (may be some fully free) because of this.
Likes: MobAmuse
Likes: jdbc
Likes: MobAmuse
I think we do not use personal data in our games, so the responsability of GDPR is for Ads companies who collects data.
https://deluxepixel.com
In other words, there are some people who want to use facebook in the same way as everyone else but do not want facebook to have any data that can be used to identify them and they don't want facebook to communicate with them!
btw, the lawyer suing them is one of the lawyers who made up the regulations.
http://money.cnn.com/video/technology/2018/05/25/burke-facebook-gdpr-lawsuit.cnnmoney/index.html
https://deluxepixel.com
Ads companies put responsability on publisher but it is not worth if you do not make money. Better removing ads and publishing as paid app. No more free apps.
Likes: antix, MobAmuse
I've decided other than what I've already done, that I'm just going to wing it and see what happens given a lot of it seems to be in a state of flux.
If the big boys can't sort it out then we have almost no chance of getting it right here.
Likes: simwhi, jdbc, hgy29, SinisterSoft, antix
This looks like a simple solution for admob in the short term:
https://developers.google.com/admob/android/eu-consent#forward_consent_to_the_google_mobile_ads_sdk
Likes: Apollo14
Likes: Apollo14
So after implementing the code from the previous post, I managed to get interstitial ads that seemed random. However, I didn't get any banner ads.
I'd love to hear your experiences.
Here is the complete code for AdsAdmob.java:
It allows you to pop a native alert, where you can ask for permission. Is that what you meant?
Likes: antix, totebo, MobAmuse
https://deluxepixel.com